Taj al-Arus (Zabidi, d. 1205H)

This root entry discusses a specific type of fabric or material, likely of Persian origin, known for its quality and association with the city of Basra. It details variations in its name and classification.

This root entry primarily discusses a place name in Bukhara and a nisba derived from it. It also touches upon a linguistic convention of the Persians regarding diminutives.

This root primarily describes concepts of roughness, elevation, and ruggedness, particularly in terrain. It also extends to feelings of unease, agitation, and being startled, as well as physical states like being plump or vigorous.

This root entry pertains to a specific geographical location in ancient Persia. It is identified as a place name, a منزل (manzil), situated between two other locations, الحلوان (al-Ḥulwān) and قرميسين (Qirmīsīn). The name is derived from that of a horse belonging to Khosrow.

This root appears to be rare and possibly dialectal, primarily associated with euphemisms for sexual intercourse and the act of being frightened or fearful.

This root primarily relates to disturbance, agitation, and hardship. It also extends to meanings of piercing, blinding, and inciting discord among people.

The root شرز (sharaza) primarily denotes harshness, severity, and difficulty. It extends to concepts of cutting, tormenting, and strong opposition. Derived terms often describe intense hardship, cruel treatment, or formidable challenges.

This root describes extreme dryness, rigidity, and unyieldingness. It can refer to a harsh, unbearable dryness of something, or a stubborn, unmanageable disposition that resists correction or training.

This root primarily relates to pointed objects, specifically a type of skewer or spit. It also extends to metaphorical meanings of provoking or inciting others through speech, and a specific geographical location associated with mounting animals.

This entry discusses the word for a jackal, with a significant debate about the correct orthography. It highlights a potential misspelling and correction within classical Arabic lexicography.

This root appears to describe the act of kicking or nudging with the foot, specifically the front part of the foot. Its usage and authenticity as a classical Arabic word are debated.

This root appears to be primarily used for proper nouns, specifically personal names and epithets. It does not seem to have a widely recognized semantic field in classical or modern Arabic beyond its use in identifying individuals.

This root primarily concerns the concept of pricking, poking, or hurting, often with a sharp object or the tongue. It extends to describe individuals with negative character traits, specific physical conditions related to sexual arousal, and even material used in saddlery.

This root primarily concerns feelings of aversion, revulsion, and unease. It describes the soul recoiling from what it dislikes, a facial expression of displeasure or tension, and a state of being startled or disgusted. The derived terms capture these nuances of negative emotional and physical reactions.

This root primarily describes individuals or animals characterized by arrogance, haughtiness, or a lofty demeanor. It can also refer to something large or imposing, and in a less common usage, to a peculiar smell or sensation.

This root primarily refers to the black cumin seed, known by various Persian-derived names. It also has a geographical reference to a specific cemetery in Baghdad.

This root entry appears to be a fragment, primarily discussing a place name. It mentions a castle or fortress in Hadramawt, Yemen, identified as 'Qārat al-Shanāhiz'. The entry notes that 'al-Shanāhiz' itself was omitted by al-Jawhari but is known locally.

This root appears to relate to arrogance and haughtiness, possibly stemming from a sense of being aloof or unapproachable. It also has a secondary meaning related to intense affection or infatuation.

This root entry discusses a specific type of date, likely of Persian origin, found in the vicinity of Basra. It details variations in its pronunciation and orthography, noting its presence in classical Arabic dictionaries.

This root entry discusses a specific plant or seed, identified as black cumin. It notes that the term was overlooked by a prominent lexicographer and provides alternative names for it.

This root primarily concerns a type of dark, fine-grained wood, often associated with walnut, used for making bowls and utensils. It also extends to a geographical location in Azerbaijan and a description of a reddish-striped pattern.

This root primarily concerns concepts of injustice, unfairness, and deprivation. It describes actions of cheating, withholding, and diminishing rights, as well as the resulting state of being wronged or having an unjust division. It also touches upon the idea of being insignificant or entering into matters rashly.

This root appears to describe something that is well-formed, strong, and securely put together. It relates to physical constitution and possibly a robust or sturdy build.

This root appears to describe intensity, particularly in the gaze or actions of a wolf. It relates to being sharp, cunning, and quick in observation or theft.

This root appears to be related to the concept of 'خصّ' (to single out, to make specific) or 'بخص' (to make specific, to particularize). It is noted as being obscure and possibly related to another root, 'شخز'.

This root primarily describes stinginess, miserliness, and a lack of generosity. It extends to concepts of hardness, roughness, and unpleasantness, applying to people, animals, and even the land.

This root appears to describe a secretive or hidden approach towards something, akin to shivering or being covered. It is a rare root with limited usage documented.

This root primarily describes a physical condition of being narrow or constricted, particularly related to the mouth and jaw, leading to difficulty in speech. It extends metaphorically to describe stinginess, stubbornness, and a horse's resistance to the bit.

This root appears to be largely obsolete, with limited usage in classical Arabic. Its primary recorded meaning relates to intense sexual intercourse, with some derived forms possibly referring to a place name or a personal name.

This root appears to be related to the concept of a fierce or ill-tempered creature, specifically a lion. Its usage is primarily found in classical poetry and lexicography, with limited modern applicability.

This root pertains to a forceful or intense form of poking or nudging, often with a finger. It describes the action of giving a strong pinch or jab.

This root appears to describe something large, stout, and imposing, particularly in reference to animals like camels and men. It conveys a sense of bulk and significant physical presence.

This root primarily describes things that are large, stout, or tough, particularly in relation to animals, terrain, and people. It can also refer to specific animals or geographical features.

This root primarily denotes intense physical action, specifically forceful treading or stepping. It extends to related forceful actions like biting and sexual intercourse.

This root primarily relates to the actions of chewing, eating, and consuming, often with a connotation of doing so reluctantly or with a full mouth. It also extends to concepts of deficiency, breaking, and the act of chewing or cleaning teeth.

This root primarily concerns the concepts of deficiency, injustice, and deviation from what is right or fair. It extends to actions of diminishing, withholding, and acting unjustly, particularly in judgment or division.

This root appears to be obscure and possibly a misspelling. The meanings provided are highly varied, including a part of a mountain, a type of camel, sexual intercourse, and fullness. It also appears in a proper name.

This root entry appears to be a fragment discussing a specific term related to female genitalia. It references other lexicographers and variations in spelling and form, suggesting a focus on obscure or debated vocabulary.

This root appears to be a rare and possibly euphemistic term for sexual intercourse. Its usage is debated among classical lexicographers, with some noting it as a substitute term and others denying its validity.

This root is related to falsehood and lying. It is considered by some lexicographers to be not of correct Arabic origin.

This root primarily concerns the concept of form, shape, style, and manner. It extends to encompass the idea of adornment, marking, and the quality of something, often with Persian origins. It also refers to specific places and types of garments.

This root primarily refers to the act of pushing or thrusting, and by extension, it is used as a euphemism for sexual intercourse.

This root primarily deals with the concept of mockery, ridicule, and making fun of someone. It also extends to a type of fish and appears in place names and personal names, possibly as a nisba. Some derived forms are noted as potentially being neologisms or loanwords.

This root appears to relate to softness or gentleness in touch. It is also used as a proper noun for a specific valley.

The root عجز (ʿajaza) primarily denotes inability, weakness, or being incapable. It extends to concepts of being late, falling behind, or being surpassed. It also encompasses physical attributes like the hindquarters of an animal or a woman, and can refer to elderly individuals or things that are old.

The root عجز (ʿajz) primarily denotes inability, weakness, or being incapable. It extends to concepts of falling short, being behind, the posterior part of something, and in specific contexts, refers to a type of poetic meter or a physical attribute.

This root appears to relate to markings or traces, specifically those left by wind on sand. It is a rare root with limited usage documented.