Taj al-Arus (Zabidi, d. 1205H)

This root primarily concerns the concept of substitution or compensation, and by extension, the act of whispering, insinuating, or speaking secretly. It also extends to the idea of confusion or being bewildered, and names for specific places or things associated with these meanings.

This root primarily concerns the act of treading, stamping, or crushing, often with force. It extends to concepts of intense conflict, severe hardship, and even specific locations or objects associated with these actions.

This root primarily concerns soft, yielding, or sandy terrain, and the difficulty or ease of traversing it. It also extends to the act of pressing down, the resulting tracks, and a specific gait of camels.

This root primarily concerns the concept of affliction, particularly skin diseases like scabies, and by extension, negative or unpleasant matters. It also extends to terms for groups of people, often with negative connotations, and the act of attributing blame or misfortune.

The root 'w-k-s' primarily denotes deficiency, reduction, or loss. This encompasses concepts like decrease in value, impairment, and even misfortune or bad luck. It can also refer to specific astronomical or medical conditions.

This root primarily relates to concepts of speed, swiftness, and rapid movement, particularly in the context of a camel's gait. It also extends to meanings of deception, treachery, and indirect communication, as well as a specific type of wolf and a place name.

This root primarily concerns the concept of rubbing, friction, or contact leading to a yielding or softening. It extends to meanings of yielding oneself sexually, and by extension, to terms for immoral women and their followers.

This root primarily concerns movement, specifically walking and running with intensity or a specific gait. It also extends to meanings of striking, breaking, trampling, and figuratively, arrogance, slander, and intense eating or sexual intercourse. Some derived terms refer to specific animals or places.

This root primarily relates to expressions of pity, endearment, and sometimes misfortune or poverty. It is often used in addressing children with varying degrees of gentleness or harshness depending on the specific derived form.

This root appears to relate to a specific type of proud or ostentatious gait, characterized by swaggering or strutting. It is primarily used in classical Arabic and is not common in modern usage.

This root appears to be related to specific plants or herbs, with some terms also referring to gossip or slander. The primary focus is on botanical or herbal nomenclature.

This root appears to be related to companionship and finding solace in someone. It describes a person who is a source of comfort and companionship, someone one can rely on or feel at ease with.

This root appears to describe someone who is rough, uncivilized, or boorish. It is used to characterize a person's harsh and unrefined nature.

This root primarily denotes various animals, including monkeys, foxes, and bears, often with connotations of slyness or cowardice. It also extends to describe harsh conditions, difficult times, and even a type of frost.

This root primarily concerns the idea of something occurring to the mind, whether as a thought, a suspicion, or an intuition. It also extends to related concepts like a faint sound, a horse's name, a lion's epithet, and a state of confusion or entanglement.

This root appears to relate to concepts of strangeness, foreignness, or being unusual. It also seems to touch upon the idea of being heavy or burdensome.

This root appears to be related to a specific type of wild animal, possibly a lion or a large feline. It is primarily used in classical poetry to describe such creatures.

This root appears to relate to severe difficulties, calamities, and overwhelming troubles. The derived terms describe intense hardships and formidable challenges.

This root appears to primarily relate to the concept of driving away or expelling, with a secondary, less common meaning referring to a type of tree.

This root appears to be related to the concept of something being large or immense, possibly with a connotation of being strong or formidable. It is discussed in the context of a specific word and its etymological accuracy.

The root ه ر س (h-r-s) primarily relates to the concept of crushing, grinding, or pounding something intensely. This core meaning extends to vigorous eating, breaking, and even to descriptions of strong animals or harsh environments.

This root appears to be related to specific names or terms, with limited semantic scope in classical Arabic lexicography. It is primarily used to denote a particular historical figure.

This root appears to relate to destruction and devastation. It describes calamities that are utterly ruinous and annihilating, suggesting a complete eradication of something.

This root primarily relates to strong, fierce, or large animals, particularly lions. It also extends to concepts of intensity, boldness, and sometimes negative attributes like frowning or clamor. Additionally, it appears in place names and personal names, some of which have historical or religious significance.

This root primarily concerns sounds, particularly quiet, rustling, or whispering sounds, and actions associated with them like crushing or ziging. It extends to concepts of stealth, hidden speech, and continuous, diligent action, often related to shepherding or labor.

This root appears to describe a specific manner of walking, characterized by swaying and strutting. It is a less common root with limited usage documented.

This root appears to relate to the concept of breaking or shattering something. It is noted as being obscure and its usage is debated among lexicographers.

This root primarily relates to taking, seizing, and moving quickly or stealthily. It encompasses concepts of theft, predatory animals like wolves, and rapid movement, often with a connotation of cunning or urgency.

This root primarily describes negative character traits, specifically being ill-mannered or ill-tempered. It is also used to denote wild animals, particularly canids like wolves and foxes, often with a connotation of their appearance or behavior.

This root appears to be related to a specific, less common term for frogs. It is noted as being omitted by some major lexicographers but included by others, indicating its rarity or specialized usage.

This root appears to describe someone or something as base, ignoble, or of low character. It can also refer to someone who is strong or robust.

This root primarily deals with concepts of companionship, familiarity, and the presence of something, often in a negative or absent sense. It also extends to terms for clothing and small, insignificant items.

This root primarily concerns concepts of wasting away, emaciation, and weakness, often due to illness or old age. It also extends to meanings of hiding, secrecy, and, unusually, great good.

This root appears to describe hiddenness, stealth, and possibly thievery. It is associated with elusive creatures, particularly wolves, and actions related to taking or stealing.

This root primarily describes intense hunger and, by extension, physical robustness and strength. It also includes a geographical name.

This root appears to describe something base, lowly, or of poor quality, often applied to animals, particularly camels, to denote their strength or lack thereof, and also to character.

This root entry is very brief and appears to be an addition to a larger work. It defines a single place name associated with the Tigris River.

The root ه م س (h-m-s) primarily relates to quietness, secrecy, and subtlety in sound and action. It encompasses hushed speech, faint footsteps, stealthy movement, and even the gentle chewing of food. It can also extend to concepts of pressing, crushing, and the quiet intensity of certain animals.

This root appears to describe physical strength and robust movement, specifically related to the legs and gait. It is primarily found in classical lexicographical works and its exact form and meaning are debated.

This root appears to be primarily associated with place names, specifically two towns in Egypt. It also relates to people who are attributed to these locations.

This root appears to relate to the act of stealthily seeking or investigating information, akin to spying or probing.

This root primarily relates to expertise, knowledge, and estimation, particularly in the context of engineering and water management. It also extends to describe a bold or experienced individual, and a specific tribe.

This root primarily relates to the concept of being consumed by something, often to the point of obsession or madness. It can also refer to intense desire or longing.

The root هيس (hayasa) primarily relates to concepts of breaking, destruction, and forceful action. It extends to meanings of roaming with boldness, excessive eating, and even a type of madness or delusion. The root also encompasses terms for a fierce lion and a strong, aggressive stallion.

This root primarily relates to forceful or extensive action, often involving movement, crushing, or taking things. It encompasses concepts like marching, trampling, seizing, and consuming, with some derived terms referring to specific tools, places, or types of people.

This root primarily concerns the concept of despair, hopelessness, and the cessation of hope. It also extends to meanings of knowing or becoming certain, and in a specific context, refers to a type of illness (consumption).

This root appears to relate to wells and their characteristics, specifically those that are established or pre-existing. It also seems to have a variant form that is synonymous with 'well'.

This root appears to be related to a specific proper noun, a kunya (patronymic or teknonym), rather than a common semantic field. It is used here to identify a historical figure.

This root appears to be related to place names, specifically a village in Egypt. The primary lemma discussed is the name of this village.