غمز

3 غَاْمَزَ [This verb is mentioned by Golius as syn. with عايب, a verb for which I find no authority: and Freytag renders it “ Vitii arguit, ” and refers to a passage in Har (p. 427 of the see. ed.) where (like as is done by Golius) المُغامِز and المُعايِب, as syn., are erroneously put for المَغامِز and المَعايِب.]