انس

يُرَوْنَ رأى ورى يرون ), and that the jinn are called جِنّ because they are [ordinarily] concealed (مُجْتَنُّونَ, i. e. مُتَوَارُونَ,) from the sight of men: (TA:) [it is said in the B, as cited in the TA, that the form أَنِسَان is also used for اـِنْسَانٌ; as though it were a dual, meaning “a double associate,” i. e., an associate with the jinn and with his own kind; for it is added, أَنِسَ بِا@لاآْجِنِّ وَأَنِسَ بِا@لاآْخَلْقِ:] some derive the word from النَّوْسُ, signifying “motion:” (TA:) some (namely, the Koofees, Msb) say that it is originally اـِنسِيَانٌ, (S, Msb, TA,) of the measure اـِفْعِلَانٌ, (S, Msb,) from النِّسْيَانُ [“forgetfulness”], (Msb,) and contracted to make it more easy of pronunciation, because of its being so often used; (S;) but it is restored to its original in forming the dim., (S, Msb,) which is أُنَيْسِيَانٌ: (Msb, TA:) this form of the dim., they say, shows the original form of the word which is its source; (TA;) and they adduce as an indication of its derivation the saying of I'Ab, اـِنَّمَا سُمِّيَ اـِنْسَانًا لِأَنَّهُ عُهِدَ اـِلَيْهِ فَنَسِىَ [ He (meaning the first man) was only named انسان because he was commanded and he forgot ]: (S, TA:) [in like manner,] it is said that النَّاسُ is originally النَّاسِى; the former of these, accord. to one reading, and the latter accord. to another, occurs in the Kur ii. 195; the latter referring to Adam, and to the words of the Kur in xx. 114: (TA:) but Az holds that اـِنْسِيَانٌ is of the measure فِعْلِيَانٌ, from الاـِنْسُ, and similar to خِرْصِيَانٌ. (L, TA. *)